Authorization

IMF credits: Relief for Ukrainian authorities, debt yoke for Ukrainian people

Read original article at 112.ua
[img]https://img.112.international/original/2016/05/10/229537.jpg">
ua.racurs.ua
The International Monetary Fund has put forward four demands to Kyiv for receiving next tranche. This was reported by the representative of the IMF in Ukraine, Jost Ljungman. In particular, we are talking about the adoption of a law on the privatization of state-owned enterprises, the creation of an anti-corruption court and the resolving of the gas prices issue in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers’ Resolution No. 187. Speaking about the latter, in practice this means that the gas price for the population should increase by 17, 6%.
Also among the voiced demands is the adoption of land reform, that is, the introduction of the land market in Ukraine. According to Ljungman, the IMF did not abandon this reform. "We decided to postpone it for 2018 in order to give time for its comprehensive development and reaching of consensus in Ukrainian society," he said.
Do these requirements meet the economic interests of Ukraine and reduce social tensions[/img]

Also let's look at another, equally controversial, "requirement": the introduction of the agricultural land market. To date (and a number of experts will agree with me), neither society, nor farmers, nor the government are ready for this, because the introduction of a free market of agricultural land will lead to de-immobilization of peasants and the formation of monopoly in agriculture.
However, the authorities, instead of accepting external loans and putting the economy on a "credit drug," should work to create conditions for stable economic growth. And here there is no way to do this without a thorough reform of the judicial and law enforcement systems. Global transformations in the country are possible only when the law operates, and not the will and interests of the elected.
Therefore, against the backdrop of internal chaos (both political and economic), IMF demands are unacceptable for Ukraine, they are a threat to national interests.
Let's look at the facts: the NBU report for October says that during 2018-2021 annual payments on the repayment and servicing of public and quasi-public debt in foreign currency will exceed $ 7 billion, namely, $ 7 billion from 2018 to 2021 annually. Total it is 28 billion dollars for four years.
At the same time, the IMF promises, according to the current lending program, only $ 5 billion tranches over several years, since Ukraine has already received $ 12 billion under the adopted program, which totals $ 17.5 billion.
It is worth noting that in 2017, according to the estimates of Ukrainian economists, the deficit of the state budget may amount to 3.5% of GDP. Therefore, it is necessary to compensate this at the expense of international and domestic loans. As a result, Ukraine is increasingly drowning into debt slavery, and the government has to urgently seek money for on-lending.
So, according to Minister of Finance Danyliuk, next year, in 2018, Kyiv plans to borrow another $ 2 billion. This is the "convenient" way for closing budget holes. Of course, this is much easier than implementation of an effective financial policy, fighting corruption and engaging in lawmaking, rather than in intrigues and speculation.
No doubt, the new terms of the IMF are unprofitable for Ukraine. And is there an alternative? Of course it is. Let’s learn from Poland. Our neighbor and strategic partner recently refusrd from $ 9.2 billion in loans from the IMF. As Polish Finance Minister Mateusz Moravetski said, they refused the credit line, because "today the economy is in such good condition that we can do it." In January-August the surplus of the state budget of Poland reached more than 4 billion zlotys (more than 1 billion dollars). Economic growth for this period was 4%.
Here you have the answer: you just have to work well, develop your state, implement reforms, and not engage in political patriotism, which has nothing to do with the creation of the state. And then Ukraine will not have to be an eternal supplicant.
So far, everything is exactly the opposite: the authorities do not hesitate to ask and borrow, and Ukrainians and several of their subsequent generations will have to pay back all these billions. So will we build a successful Ukraine with such an approach? No comments.
See also:
Leave a comment
News
  • Latest
  • Read
  • Commented
Calendar Content
«    Ноябрь 2017    »
ПнВтСрЧтПтСбВс
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930