Authorization

Can predictive analytics be made safe for humans?

Massive-scale predictive analytics is a relatively new phenomenon, one that challenges both decades of law as well as consumer thinking about privacy.
As a technology, it may well save thousands of lives in applications like predictive medicine, but if it isnt used carefully, it may prevent thousands from getting loans, for instance, if an underwriting algorithm is biased against certain users.
I chatted with Dennis Hirsch a few weeks ago about the challenges posed by this new data economy. Hirsch is a professor of law at Ohio State and head of its Program on Data and Governance. Hes also affiliated with the universitys Risk Institute.
Data ethics is the new form of risk mitigation for the algorithmic economy, he said. In a post-Cambridge Analytica world, every company has to assess what data it has on its customers and mitigate the risk of harm. How to do that, though, is at the cutting edge of the new field of data governance, which investigates the processes and policies through which organizations manage their data.
Youre reading the Extra Crunch Daily. Like this newsletter? Subscribe for freeto follow all of ourdiscussions and debates.
Traditional privacy regulation asks whether you gave someone notice and given them a choice, he explains. That principle is the bedrock for Europes GDPR law, and for the patchwork of laws in the U.S. that protect privacy. Its based around the simplistic idea that a datum such as a customers address shouldnt be shared with, say, a marketer without that users knowledge. Privacy is about protecting the address book, so to speak.
The rise of predictive analytics though has completely demolished such privacy legislation. Predictive analytics is a fuzzy term, but essentially means interpreting raw data and drawing new conclusions through inference. This is the story of the famous Target data crisis, where the retailer recommended pregnancy-related goods to women who had certain patterns of purchases. As Charles Duhigg explained at the time:
Many shoppers purchase soap and cotton balls, but when someone suddenly starts buying lots of scent-free soap and extra-big bags of cotton balls, in addition to hand sanitizers and washcloths, it signals they could be getting close to their delivery date.
Predictive analytics is difficult to predict. Hirsch says I dont think any of us are going to be intelligent enough to understand predictive analytics. Talking about customers, he said They give up their surface items like cotton balls and unscented body lotion they know they are sharing that, but they dont know they are giving up their pregnancy status. People are not going to know how to protect themselves because they cant know what can be inferred from their surface data.
In other words, the scale of those predictions completely undermines notice and consent.
Even though the law hasnt caught up to this exponentially more challenging problem, companies themselves seem to be responding in the wake of Target and Facebooks very public scandals. What we are hearing is that we dont want to put our customers at risk, Hirsch explained. They understand that this predictive technology gives them really awesome power and they can do a lot of good with it, but they can also hurt people with it. The key actors here are corporate chief privacy officers, a role that has cropped up in recent years to mitigate some of these challenges.
Hirsch is spending significant time trying to build new governance strategies to allow companies to use predictive analytics in an ethical way, so that we can achieve and enjoy its benefits without having to bear these costs from it. Hes focused on four areas: privacy, manipulation, bias, and procedural unfairness. We are going to set out principles on what is ethical and and what is not, he said.
Much of that focus has been on how to help regulators build policies that can manage predictive analytics. Since people cant understand the extent that inferences can be made with their data, I think a much better regulatory approach is to have someone who does understand, ideally some sort of regulator, who can draw some lines. Hirsch has been researching how the FTCs Unfairness Authority may be a path forward for getting such policies into practice.
He analogized this to the Food and Drug Administration. We have no ability to assess the risks of a given drug [so] we give it to an expert agency and allow them to assess it, he said. Thats the kind of regulation that we need.
Hirsch overall has a balanced perspective on the risks and rewards here. He wants analytics to be more socially acceptable but at the same time, sees the needs for careful scrutiny and oversight to ensure that consumers are protected. Ultimately, he sees that as incredibly beneficial to companies who can take the value out of this tech without risking provoking consumer ire.

Who will steal your data more: China or America?


Can predictive analytics be made safe for humans?
Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images
See also:
Leave a comment
News
  • Latest
  • Read
  • Commented
Calendar Content
«     2019    »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930