Government denies Oracles protest of $10B Pentagon JEDI cloud RFP

When Oracle filed a protest in August with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) last August that the Pentagons $10 billion JEDI RFP process was unfair, it probably had little chance of succeeding. Today the GAO turned away the protest.
The JEDI contract has been set up as a winner-take-all affair. With $10 billion on the table, there has been much teeth-gnashing and complaining that the deck has been stacked to favor one vendor, Amazon. The Pentagon has firmly denied this, but it hasnt stopped Oracle and IBM from complaining loudly from the get-go that there were problems with the way the RFP was set up.
At least with the Oracle complaint, the GAO put that idea firmly to rest today. For starters, the GAO made it clear that the winner-take-all approach was just fine, stating the Defense Departments decision to pursue a single-award approach to obtain these cloud services is consistent with applicable statutes (and regulations) because the agency reasonably determined that a single-award approach is in the governments best interests for various reasons, including national security concerns, as the statute allows,the GAO said in a statement.
The statement went onto say that the GAO didnt find that the Pentagon favored any vendor in during the RFP period. GAOs decision also concludes that the Defense Department provided reasonable support for all of the solicitation provisions that Oracle contended exceeded the agencys needs. Finally, the GAO found no evidence of conflict of interest on the DODs part as Oracle had suggested.

Putting the Pentagon $10B JEDI cloud contract into perspective
See also:
Leave a comment
  • Latest
  • Read
  • Commented
Calendar Content
«     2020    »