Russia seeks secret trial of tortured Ukrainian accused of Crimea sabotage plot

Secret documents have been cited in Russian-occupied Crimea to justify holding the trial of Yevhen Panov behind closed doors. Since no secret material was ever mentioned to either Panov or his lawyer, this may well simply be the latest attempt to conceal the lack of any substance to the charges against the Ukrainian.
It will not be the first time. Panov was held for two months without access to a lawyer after being seized and tortured in August 2016 and has been under massive pressure ever since to plead guilty to concocted charges.

Speaking after the hearing, Panovs lawyer Dmitry Dinzeexplainedthat they had been suddenly told that the material includes a secret volume. If there really are such state secrets, then the investigator has committed a crime by not telling either Dinze or his client, and Panov could certainly have passed such information on to his family.
Dinze was also asked to sign a non-disclosure undertaking but refused on the grounds that there are no state secrets involved. He latertold Hromadske Radio that the secret volume is supposedly about the sites where the alleged acts of sabotage were supposedly planned.

Panovis chargedwith planning acts of sabotage in Crimea as part of a group of saboteurs, as well as with smuggling ammunition across the customs border of the Customs Union, with four articles of the Russian criminal code listed (Article 281 2a for the planning acts of sabotage; Article 226.1 3 and 222 3 over the alleged movement and storage of ammunition, as well 30 1, and 3 committing or attempting a crime).
He is now accused of having planned acts of sabotage on civilian and military sites in Crimea, with these supposedly including a water reservoir; a Russian military unit; a ferry crossing; a chemical factory and plans to blow up Pantsir C1 self-propelled anti-aircraft military weapon systems...
The then 39-year-old from Zaporizhya worked as a driver for the Zaporizhya Nuclear Power Plant in Enerhodar but had also responded to Russias invasion of Crimea and military aggression in Donbas by active work as a volunteer, both in civil defense for his city and in helping the Ukrainian army.

On August 6, 2016, Panov responded to a phone call, seemingly from a fellow volunteer, asking him to help evacuate a family from Russian-occupied Crimea who was in danger. This, however, his family only discovered much later, after he disappeared.
The first they learned of his whereabouts was on August 10 when Russias FSB [security service]claimedthat it had foiled terrorist acts planned by the Ukrainian Defence Ministrys military intelligence and targeting critically important parts of Crimeas infrastructure. This was aimed, the FSB asserted, at destabilizing the situation in the run-up to Russias elections which were illegally taking place in occupied Crimea.

The FSB asserted that there had been major incidents, with shelling from mainland Ukraine, during the nights from 6-7 and 7-8 August, with 2 Russians an FSB officer and a soldier killed. Although two Russians did die, there are independent reports suggesting that at least one of the men was killed in a drunken brawl. There was nothing to back the claims about the second night and supposed shelling from Ukraine.Skepticism was only exacerbated by the fact that the occupation regime had blocked various independent Internet sitesprior to the alleged events.
The claims were trumpeted by Russias leaders and state-controlled media, but based solely on videoed confessions from four men: Panov;Andriy Zakhtei;Redvan Suleymanov; andVolodymyr Prysich.

The video with Panovs confession and, supposedly, his and Zakhteis stockpile of weapons was very sloppily done. One scene, for example, showed a full moon which meant it must have been shot at least three weeks earlier. An independent forensic analysisfound no tracesto suggest that Panov and Zakhtei had ever touched the alleged stockpile.
A videoproduced by the FSB was shown widely on state-controlled Russian media. On it, Panov is seen confessing to working for Ukrainian military intelligence and saying that he was invited to Kyiv and told that a group was being formed for acts of sabotage in Crimea. He reels off several names, none of them the people he was allegedly caught with, and says that they had come to Crimea together to decide on targets for the acts of sabotage and had chosen the ferry crossing, an oil handling terminal, a helicopter regiment and chemical factory.
On the video, Panov looked as though he had been beaten and also as though he was saying what he had been instructed to say.

It was therefore of immense concern that the FSB prevented the lawyer Panovs family employed from seeing his client. At one stage they produced a scrap of paper, with a typed statement, allegedly from Panov, rejecting the lawyers services. The paper was unsigned, and his family, by now seriously worried, were helped by a human rights group to apply to the European Court of Human Rights. The latterdemandedinformation from Russia regarding the origin of Panovs bruises, etc. and confirmation that he had been allowed to see the lawyer his family had chosen.
Following this communication from ECHR, and after two full months of total isolation, Panov was able to briefly meet with the lawyer. He immediately retracted all testimony, confirming that it had been obtained under torture. He has since described the torture methods, which form part of his application to ECHR, with these including severe beating; being suspended in handcuffs; mock executions; electric shocks and clamps applied to his genitals.

Both Panov and Zakhtei were moved to Moscow shortly after that brief meeting and placed under heavy pressure to give up their independent lawyers. They refused and were soon moved back to Crimea, and the Simferopol SIZO [remand unit] where the conditions are in themselves a form of torture.
The mounting pressure and threats of a much worse sentence if he didnt comply finally prompted Zakhtei to agree to cooperate. He pleaded guilty and gave up his lawyer, yet a Russian-controlled court in Crimea stillsentencedhim on 16 February 2018 to 6.5 years imprisonment.
It is likely that Zakhteis confession will be used to claim that the charges against him and Panov have been proven.

In fact, nothing is proven, and a telling detail is that of the four men accused of involvement in a supposed plot which they were shown on Russian TV confessing to, one - Redvan Suleymanov ended up accused of something only slightly linked to the original confession, while Volodymyr Prysichwas sentencedon May 18, 2017, to 3 years imprisonment on the totally different charge of possession of a narcotic substance.
While Suleymanov remained silent about the treatment he had received, his lawyer Emil Kurbedinov clearly assumed that he had been tortured. The three other men have all spoken of the torture, including electric shocks to their genitals, used to extract confessions to non-existent sabotage plots.
Read the original text at .
See also:
Leave a comment
  • Latest
  • Read
  • Commented
Calendar Content
«     2019    »