Constitutional Court recognizes article on illicit enrichment unconstitutional one

Open source
The Constitutional Court of Ukraine decided to recognize illicit enrichment of officials as an unconstitutional article of the Criminal Code of Ukraine on Wednesday, February 27. This decision is posted
According to the decision, the court recognized article 368-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (illicit enrichment) as the article which does not comply with the Constitution of Ukraine.

"The Constitutional Court of Ukraine came to the conclusion that article 368-2 of the Criminal Code does not meet the requirements of clarity, accuracy, and unambiguousness, and therefore contradicts legal certainty as an integral part of the rule of law principle, stated in article 8 of the Constitution of Ukraine"
, - the report said.
It is noted that the abovementioned article is not in line with the constitutional principle of presumption of innocence and with the constitutional precept on the inadmissibility of bringing a person to responsibility for refusal to testify against themselves, their family or close relatives.
The Constitutional Court considers that article 368-2 is formulated in such a way that all the doubts concerning the legality of the assets acquiring by a person can be interpreted not in their favor, but can be regarded as the confirmation of their illicit enrichment, although according to part 3 of article 62 of the Constitution of Ukraine, "all the doubts concerning proving a person’s guilt should be interpreted in their favor”.

Thus, by the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, article 368-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine has been declared unconstitutional one and it loses its validity from February 26, 2019.
"The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine is the obligatory one, it is also the final decision, which cannot be appealed," – the report said.
As we reported earlier, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine ruled unconstitutional an article of a Criminal Code on the illicit enrichment of public officials upon the pretext that the provisions of the article violate the presumption of innocence.
See also:
Leave a comment
  • Latest
  • Read
  • Commented
Calendar Content
«    Май 2019    »