'Right to Rent' checks breach human rights - High Court" width="976" height="549">
Rules aimed at preventing illegal immigrants from renting properties are "discriminatory" and breach human rights laws, the High Court has ruled. The "Right to Rent" scheme, which requires landlords to check the immigration status of tenants, was introduced in England in 2016. Judges said it would be illegal to roll it out in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland without further evaluation. The Home Office said it was "disappointed" by the ruling. Judge Martin Spencer said the scheme had "little or no effect" on its main aim of controlling immigration and even if it had, this was "significantly outweighed by the discriminatory effect".
He added that the evidence "strongly showed" that the scheme was causing landlords to discriminate against potential tenants because of their nationality and ethnicity.
Right to Rent 'leads to discrimination'
Reality Check: Has the 'hostile environment' workedResponding to the ruling, legal policy director Chai Patel said there was "no place for racism in the UK housing market".He added that the judgement "only reveals the tip of the iceberg" and called on Parliament to scrap the policy. The Residential Landlords Association also welcomed the ruling and said the policy had turned landlords into "untrained and unwilling border police". The group said its research had found that fear of getting things wrong led to private landlords being less likely to rent to those without a British passport or those with limited time to remain in the UK. The Home Office argued the scheme was neither "directly or indirectly discriminatory" but was intended to discourage illegal residence in the UK.It said it had been granted permission to appeal and was giving careful consideration to the judge's comments.
'Hostile environment' policy
The Right to Rent scheme, which was first trialled in the West Midlands, requires landlords to carry out checks on prospective tenants, such as seeing their passport or visa. Failing to do so is a criminal offence, carrying a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment or a fine.The scheme is part of the government's "hostile environment" policy and was introduced under the Immigration Act 2014.Lara ten Caten, a solicitor with Liberty, which intervened in the case, said the judgement was "another nail in the coffin for the government's misguided, discriminatory and unworkable hostile environment policy"."While effective immigration control is a legitimate aim for any government, the Home Office must stop outsourcing its discriminatory policies to third parties who are ill-equipped to enforce them but may be slapped with heavy fines and even end up in prison if they don't," she said.
Have you had difficulties finding a property to rent because of your background? Share your experiences by emailing include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways:
WhatsApp: +447555 173285
Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSay
Send an SMS or MMS to 61124 or +44 7624 800 100
Please read our terms and conditions and privacy policy
Or use the form below
Your contact details
Your E-mail address
Town & Country
Your telephone number
If you are happy to be contacted by a BBC journalist please leave a telephone number that we can
contact you on. In some cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name as
you provide it and location, unless you state otherwise. Your contact details will never be published.
When sending us pictures, video or eyewitness accounts at no time should you endanger yourself or others,
take any unnecessary risks or infringe any laws. Please ensure you have read the terms and conditions.
Terms and conditions
The BBC's Privacy Policy
UK immigration
Home Office
See also:
Leave a comment
  • Latest
  • Read
  • Commented
Calendar Content
«    Май 2019    »